MID-ATLANTIC CONTINGENCY PLANNING GROUP

April 28th, 2004

 

The Spring meeting of the Mid-Atlantic Contingency Planning Group was held in conjunction with the combined Ohio/Kentucky Contingency Groups meeting at the Stonewall Resort in Roanoke WV.  Gale Carovillano called the meeting to order.

 

The following were in attendance:

 

Chairperson:               Gale Carovillano (Columbia Gas Transmission)

Vice Chairman:           Todd Smith (Roanoke Gas)

Secretary:                   Tom Gibson (Columbia Distribution)

 

Randy Johnson           Columbia Distribution

Skip Hall                      Columbia Distribution

Gary Gardner              AGA

Gary Forman               Nisource Pipelines

Roy Rushing               Ohio Gas Association

Doug Vaught               Cinergy

Ed Unger                     South Jersey Gas Co.

Dawn Elliott                 Transco

Gary Northrup             AGL Resources Inc.

David Daughtry           City of Richmond

Mike Gagnet                Roanoke Gas

Drew Moncol               Dominion – VA Power

Jody Derrickson          Dominion Trans. & Cove Point

Jody Tidd                     Dominion Delivery

Dan Scarberry            Dominion Delivery

Bill Christian                Columbia Transmission

Jim Cosgrove              Washington Gas

P. Scott Murphy          Washington Gas

John Ward                  Baltimore Gas & Electric

Chuck Jager                Baltimore Gas & Electric

Brian Blount                Columbia Transmission

Debbie Toman            TGP/ANR

Chili Childress             Columbia Transmission

David Spencer            Columbia Transmission

Michael Radford          Columbia Transmission

Steve Hunter               Columbia Transmission

Steve Browder            Columbia Transmission

Tim Clark                    Columbia Transmission

Sharon Burdette          Columbia Transmission

 

 

Introductions and Cross-Group Discussion:

 

The meeting started with introductions.  This spring meeting included attendees from both the Mid-Atlantic Contingency Group and the Ohio and Kentucky Contingency Groups.  Given the diversity and lack of familiarity between the groups, it was recognized that the value in this meeting would be from the exchange of ideas and methodologies.  Discussions about additional meetings of this nature were well received and it was suggested that once every other year during the spring meeting was appropriate.

 

Joining the groups was AGA’s Gary Gardner.  Gary (AGA executive staff) is the AGA’s CIO and also serves as point person with government agencies on security issues.  Gary reviewed his efforts in educating government agencies as to the industries efforts in preparing for emergency situations.  Most recently, Gary attended a critical infrastructure meeting in which he noted that the DOE was, to a certain extent, impressed with the efforts of groups such as ours; however, did have the opinion that we (Gas Companies) were too “internally focused”.  Also noted was that while he could point to various contingency groups and efforts in place on the east coast and mid-west, the southeast and west coast had little or no activity.

 

Following Gary’s comments the group in general discussed the value and pitfalls of regionalized groups and efforts.

 

Tom Gibson presented a history of the Virginia and Maryland Groups and the combining of those two groups into the Mid-Atlantic Contingency Supply Planning Group.

 

Dan Scarberry (representing the Ohio and Kentucky Groups) reviewed the value in running their mock emergencies and holding meetings.

 

Tim Clark (TCO) briefly discussed the Northeast Gas Association (NGA) efforts and methods.  This Group, like the Mid-Atlantic Group, was formed from two separate groups; the New York Gas Association (NYGAS) and the New England Gas Association (NEGA).  The NGA is more similar to the individual state gas associations (OGA, KGA, etc.) from other states such that they functionally cover more that just gas supply planning.  Those functions include:  Gas system operations, technology R&D, gas supply planning, education and training, outreach, and financial and administration.

 

 

 

WINTER/SUMMER OPERATIONS

 

Columbia Transmissions:

Tim Clarke reported that the 2003-2004 winter operating season was 2.5% warmer than normal.  Peak day occurred on January 30 with a total throughput of 6.7 MMDth.   Average temperature was 10 degrees.

 

This winter, supply receipts totaled 429.0 MMDth and FSS withdrawals totaled 197.0 MMDth for a total throughput of 626.0 MMDth.  Non-firm capacity was restricted 171 days in Areas 1 and 10, 77 days in Area 2, and 93 days in Area 4.  There were no major incidents related to compressors and/or line outages.

 

TCO’s FSS customers started the winter season with 97.8% of their SCQ and ended at 20.7%. They withdrew 197.0 Bcf in total this winter as compared to 219.1 Bcf last year.

 

TCO will continue with its pigging program this summer.  They plan to smart pig a total of approximately 993 miles of pipeline in six states (WV, VA, ME, PA, OH, and NY).

 

Ceredo to Lanham will be out of service from May 2004 to November 2004 to make the line piggable due to the new Pipeline Integrity Rule.

 

VM107 in Virginia (outlet of Bickers) will be down for smart pigging.

 

BGE

LNG currently at 75%.  Peak day was on 1/10/04.  Average temp was 13 degrees.  Operations in recent years have changed significantly for Gas Control, which has taken over LNG operations (now automated).

 

WGL

Reported that the winter in their operating area was 7% colder than normal.  Peak day was on 1/10/04 with 1.5 BCF sendout at an average temperature of 17 degrees.  Very little peaking was utilized.

A freeze up occurred putting 1200 customers out.

Current projections are for a 3.5% growth rate for the next 10 years.

 

DTI

Jody Derrickson reported that the winter was 1.4% colder than normal and 1/25/04 was their peak day with 5.7 BCF in deliveries to DTI customers.  Other partnership operations and LNG (Cove Point) accounted for another 2.0 BCF of operational throughput.  Storage began at 97% full and ended at 26%.  The resultant turnover was 208 BCF for DTI with partnership accounting for another 80 BCF. 

Cove Point receives shipments once every 5 to 7 days.  Each ship contains about 3.1 BCF. 

Jody reported various construction and pigging projects.

The PL1 line will be pigged this summer in compliance with the Integrity Rule.

 

VA Power

Drew reported that a nuclear plant would be down in May.  Anticipated use of gas as a fuel this summer will be more dependent on price; unexpected outages and summer temperatures driving AC load.

 

Roanoke

Reported that the winter was near normal.  Peak day was 10% warmer than normal.

 

Richmond

David reported that peak day for Richmond was 161,000 dth with 49-degree days.

 

VNG

Gary reported that total throughput for the winter was 26 BCF with peak day occurring on 1/10/04.  Peak day thru was 308 mmcf.  They were left with 30% in storage.

 

South Jersey

Ed Unger reported that peak day was on 1/10/04 with an average temp of 11 degrees and a new single day record sendout of 426,466 dth.  The LNG plant operated 29 days from December 2nd thru February 17th.  Total LNG vaporized was 298,570 mcf and they received 221 truckloads during the winter season.  SJ established a portable LNG vaporizer site to supplement supply to weak distribution system.  The unit was operated 6 times this past winter.

Ed further reported on parts of their system, which are suffering for lack of capacity due to growth, and the lack of concessions for constructing new capacity.

 

Columbia of Virginia

Tom reported that this winter was 5% warmer than normal and 8% warmer when compared against last year.  Peak day occurred on January 25th at 20 degrees and with a throughput of 377 mdth.  Throughput for the season was 36BCF.  Storage ended up at 24% of SCQ.

 

The various Ohio and Kentucky group members reported on their activity as well.

 

 

MOCK EMERGENCY

 

The majority of respondents on the Mid-Atlantic mock relied on peaking to survive the loss of capacity.  The drill was successful at demonstrating some deficiencies especially when broken down by hour such that most were deficient in supply early in the day.  Columbia Gas of Virginia reported that it likely would have lost a portion of its Fredericksburg market due to its reliance on DTI’s PL1 line.  This calculation did not account for the fact that CGV may have been able to pull off of line-pack for some time.

Other corrective actions were discovered during the meeting, which were not explored during the Mock.  Ed Unger indicated that he was not available on the day of the mock and those individuals at South Jersey that were present were unaware as to how to respond.  Ed indicated that for the day of the mock he had between 80 and 100 mmcf he could of shed off of TCO.  Additionally, Jody (DTI) indicated that he could have taken the stranded PL1 line gas back to TET for redelivery to TCO.

Tim Clark reviewed the OH/KY Mock.  Both Mock emergencies revealed that communication continues to be something that can be improved upon. 

 

 

Web Sites

Roy Rushing (OGA) demonstrated and reviewed the content of the OGA Web site particularly as it related to all mutual assistance programs.  Discussion about the Mid-Atlantic website included ideas about populating it with specific capacity information so as to be readily available during a mock or real emergency.  This discussion led to more discussion about secured access for the web site.  Given that TCO is currently sponsoring the web site, Gale Carovillano and Bill Christian are to investigate the possibility of adding secured access.

 

Other Topics

Skip Hall reviewed the Bellingham incident as the driving force behind the OQ2 efforts.  AGA, INGAA and other industry representatives are developing standards, which could affect an expected ruling by the OPS.  This ruling is expected to specifically call for Controller certification with implementation by December 2007.

 

Fall Meeting

Jimmy Cosgrove (WGL) indicated that they may be able to host the fall meeting for the Mid-Atlantic group and would touch base with Gale on this possibility.  Gary Gardner also suggested the possibility of the AGA sponsoring a future meeting.

 

Return